Complainant vs respondent.

ALEJANDRO ESTRADA, Complainant, vs. SOLEDAD S. ESCRITOR, Respondent. R E S O L U T I O N. PUNO, J.: While man is finite, he seeks and subscribes to the Infinite. Respondent Soledad Escritor once again stands before the Court invoking her religious freedom and her Jehovah God in a bid to save her family – united without the benefit of …

Complainant vs respondent. Things To Know About Complainant vs respondent.

For the Court's consideration is the disbarment complaint [1] tiled by Fe A. Ylaya (complainant) against Atty. Glenn Carlos Gacott (respondent) who allegedly deceived the complainant and her late husband, Laurentino L. Ylaya, into signing a "preparatory" Deed of Sale that the respondent converted into a Deed of Absolute Sale in favor of his relatives.In his comment, dated July 14, 1999, he cites pressure of work and his belief that the matter be better left to the permanent judge of Branch 2 considering the administrative and criminal complaints filed against him (respondent) by complainant. Respondent’s excuse is unjustifiable. The fact that respondent judge presides over four branches ...A.C. No. 3056 August 16, 1991. ATTY. VICENTE C. RENOMERON respondent. This complaint for disbarment is related to the administrative case which complainant Attorney Fernando T. Collantes, house counsel for V & G Better Homes Subdivision, Inc. (V & G for short), filed against Attorney Vicente C. Renomeron, Register of Deeds of Tacloban City, for ...Complainant Samson Sindon charged respondent Raphiel Alzate, Presiding Judge of the Regional Trial Court (RTC)-Branch 1, Bangued, Abra and Atty. Janice Siganay Querrer, Clerk of Court of the same court with violation of Section 3(e) of Republic Act No. 3019 (RA 3019), [1] Section 5 of Republic Act No. 6713 (RA 6713) [2] and Section 1 of Rule 137 of the Rules of Court.Complainant Aurillo, who previously filed four administrative cases against respondent (i.e. Administrative Matters No. RTJ-839, No. RTJ-111, No. RTJ-984 and RTJ-1097), all of which were dismissed for lack of merit, appears to have succeeded to sully respondent's honor in the present administrative cases. Reading between the lines of the ...

Complainant Benilda Madella is a Clerk in the Office of the Clerk of Court, Regional Trial Court (RTC), Bayombong, Nueva Vizcaya, while respondent Atty. Rosalie Dallong-Galicinao is the Clerk of Court and Ex-Officio Provincial Sheriff of the RTC, Bambang, Nueva Vizcaya. Their offices are both housed at the Dumlao Hall of Justice within the Capital Compound in …A.C. No. 3056 August 16, 1991. ATTY. VICENTE C. RENOMERON respondent. This complaint for disbarment is related to the administrative case which complainant Attorney Fernando T. Collantes, house counsel for V & G Better Homes Subdivision, Inc. (V & G for short), filed against Attorney Vicente C. Renomeron, Register of Deeds of Tacloban City, for ...27 Nov 2020 ... In the case of Malabika Bhattacharjee vs. Internal Complaints Committee, Vivekananda College and Ors., Calcutta High Court, decided on 27th ...

Continuing, complainant averred that her friendship with respondent soured after her filing, in the later part of 2000, of criminal and disciplinary actions against the latter. What, per complainant's account, precipitated the filing was when respondent, then a member of the BFP promotion board, demanded a cellular phone in exchange for the ...A.C. No. 7676 June 10, 2014 AMADO T. DIZON, Complainant, vs. ATTY. NORLITA DE TAZA, Respondent. Legal Ethics; Canon 16; Rule 16.01. FACTS: Amado Dizon alleged that he, along with his siblings, engaged the services of Romero De Taza Cruz and Associates to represent them in a case.

This case is an offshoot of the administrative Complaint 1 filed by Tomas P. Tan, Jr. (complainant) against Atty. Haide V. Gumba (respondent), and for which respondent was suspended from the practice of law for six months. The issues now ripe for resolution are: a) whether respondent disobeyed a lawful order of the Court by not abiding by the ...This bar matter refers to the complaint filed by Enrique Javier de Zuzuarregui (complainant) before the Office of the Bar Confidant (OBC) against Anthony de Zuzuarregui …PETER T. DONTON, Complainant, vs. ATTY. EMMANUEL O. TANSINGCO, Respondent. D E C I S I O N. CARPIO, J.: The Case. This is a disbarment complaint against respondent Atty. Emmanuel O. Tansingco ("respondent") for serious misconduct and deliberate violation of Canon 1, 1 Rules 1.01 2 and 1.02 3 of the Code of Professional Responsibility ("Code ...Whether the sexual encounter between the respondent and complainant was or was not with the latter’s consent is of no moment. Respondent clearly committed a disgraceful, grossly immoral and highly reprehensible act. Such conduct is a transgression of the standards of morality required of the legal profession and should be disciplined accordingly.

Complainant is the Medical Director and principal stockholder of the Belo Medical Group, Inc. (BMGI), a corporation duly organized and existing under Philippine laws 2 and engaged in the specialized field of cosmetic surgery.3 On the other hand, respondent is the lawyer of a certain Ms. Josefina "Josie" Norcio (Norcio ), who filed criminal cases against …

This is a Complaint [1] for disbarment filed by Helen Gradiola (Helen), charging respondent lawyer Atty. Romulo A. Deles (respondent lawyer) with violating the Code of Professional Responsibility, specifically Rule 9.01 and Rule 9.02 of Canon 9; and Rule 10.1 and Rule 10.02 of Canon 10 thereof. [2] Helen claimed that respondent lawyer was her counsel in a civil case …

Before the Court is a Counter-Complaint1 filed by complainant (Ret.) Judge Virgilio Alpajora (Complainant) against respondent Atty. Ronaldo Antonio V. Calayan (Respondent), which originated from an administrative complaint filed by the latter against the former before the Office of the Court Administrator (OCA) for ignorance of the law and/or ... This petition was consolidated with A.C. No. 5299 per the Court’s Resolution dated March 4, 2003. In a Resolution dated March 26, 2003, the parties were required to manifest whether or not they were willing to submit the case for resolution on the basis of the pleadings. 10 Complainant filed his Manifestation on April 25, 2003, stating that ...2 Des 2022 ... But both in civil and criminal cases, the person against whom a lawsuit is filed is called the defendant. Example of Plaintiff and Defendant. If ...The allegations against the appellant were that he raped the complainant who was (7) years old at the time. Initially it was alleged that this offence occurred on the 19 th of December 2016. This ‘time-period’ was however the subject of ana amendment in terms of the CPA to indicate a period from the 1 st to the 14 th of December 2016.It was really a personal request, a private matter between respondent and complainant, thus, respondent executed a promissory note for the amount, a copy of which is probably still in the possession of the complainant. 9. . . . [T]he family of the complainant and that of the respondent were very close and intimate with each other.This administrative case stemmed from a letter-complaint [1] dated February 10, 2013 filed by complainant Lolita R. Martin (complainant) against respondent Atty. Jesus M. Dela Cruz (respondent) for the latter's failure to return the acceptance fee in the amount of P60,000.00 he received from complainant, despite several demands. The Facts

Here are some tips: Research and understand the difference between civil and criminal cases. Use “claimant” only when referring to the party making a claim or bringing a case to court. Use “respondent” only when referring to the party responding to the claim or accusation made by the other party.ORLANDO V. DIZON, Complainant, vs. ATTY. MARICHU C. LAMBINO, Respondent. x-----x. ATTY. MARICHU C. LAMBINO, Complainant, vs. ATTY. ORLANDO V. DIZON, Respondent. D E C I S I O N. CARPIO MORALES, J.: The killing during a rumble on December 8, 1994 of University of the Philippines (UP) graduating student Dennis …A.C. No. 6057 June 27, 2006. PETER T. DONTON, Complainant, vs. ATTY. EMMANUEL O. TANSINGCO, Respondent. D E C I S I O N. CARPIO, J.: The Case. This is a disbarment complaint against respondent Atty. Emmanuel O. Tansingco ("respondent") for serious misconduct and deliberate violation of Canon 1, 1 Rules 1.01 2 and 1.02 3 of the Code of …Linked numbers below refer to the DS numbers of the cases concerned. Place your mouse over the link to see the title of the dispute; click to go to the page for that dispute. Lower on this page there are tables of which country/territory complained against which, and which country/territory has been complained against by which.In his Answer, [8] respondent denied complainant's allegation that he misrepresented that complainant was willing to sell the property in the amount of P350,000.00, since he was duly armed with an SPA to enter into a compromise agreement, and the price of P350,000.00 was the actual price paid by the complainant to the owner of the property.TOMAS P. TAN, JR., complainant, vs. ATTY. HAIDE V. GUMBA, respondent. A. No. 9000, SPECIAL FIRST DIVISION, January 10, 2018, DEL CASTILLO, J. It is common sense that when the Court orders the suspension of a lawyer from the practice of law, the lawyer must desist from performing all functions which require the application of legal knowledge within the period of his or her suspension.WINSTON BRIAN CHIA LAO AND CHRISTOPHER TROY CHIA LAO, RESPONDENTS; G.R. No. 207075, February 10, 2020 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES, REPRESENTED BY THE SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON NATURALIZATION (SCN), PETITIONERS, v. JON NICHOLAS CHIA LAO, RESPONDENT.

A.C. No. 6160 March 30, 2006. NESTOR PEREZ , Complainant, vs. ATTY. DANILO DE LA TORRE, Respondent. D E C I S I O N. YNARES-SANTIAGO, J.: In a letter-complaint 1 dated July 30, 2003 addressed to then Chief Justice Hilario G. Davide, Jr., complainant Nestor Perez charged respondent Atty. Danilo de la Torre with misconduct or conduct unbecoming of a lawyer for representing conflicting interests.Sulley Muntari was given a yellow card for dissent during an Italian league game, after he complained about persistent abuse from fans. Sulley Muntari, one of Ghana’s biggest soccer stars who plays in one of Europe’s top soccer leagues, is ...

Causing. [A.C. No. 12883. March 2, 2021.] ENRICO R. VELASCO, complainant, vs.ATTY. BERTENI C. CAUSING, respondent. This administrative case is rooted on the Complaint-Affidavit 1 for disbarment filed by Enrico R. Velasco (complainant) against Atty. Berteni C. Causing (Atty. Causing) before the Integrated Bar of the Philippines (IBP) for alleged ...Complainant Samson Sindon charged respondent Raphiel Alzate, Presiding Judge of the Regional Trial Court (RTC)-Branch 1, Bangued, Abra and Atty. Janice Siganay Querrer, Clerk of Court of the same court with violation of Section 3(e) of Republic Act No. 3019 (RA 3019), [1] Section 5 of Republic Act No. 6713 (RA 6713) [2] and Section 1 of Rule 137 of the Rules of Court.In a Complaint [1] filed by Jose Antonio G. Gabucan (complainant) against Atty. Florencio A. Narido, Jr. (Atty. Narido, Jr.), complainant charges Atty. Narido, Jr. for violation of Rule 1.01, [2] Canon 1, Rule 18.04, [3] Canon 18 and Rule 20.04, [4] Canon 20 of the Code of Professional Responsibility (CPR).. Fact of the Case. Complainant alleged that he is the …Definitions Plaintiff A plaintiff (Π in legal shorthand) is the party who initiates a lawsuit (also known as an action) before a court. By doing so, the plaintiff seeks a legal remedy. Respondent A respondent is a person who is called upon to issue a response to a communication made by another.Sulley Muntari was given a yellow card for dissent during an Italian league game, after he complained about persistent abuse from fans. Sulley Muntari, one of Ghana’s biggest soccer stars who plays in one of Europe’s top soccer leagues, is ...In lang=en terms the difference between respondent and claimant. is that respondent is person who answers for the defendant in a case before a court. In some legal systems, when one appeals a criminal case, one names the original court as defendant, but the state is the respondent while claimant is the party who initiates a lawsuit before a court.Complainant claims that respondent yielded 'one (1) Super .38 cal. Springfield Automatic Pistol, SN NMII 3138, one (1) magazine with seven (7) live ammos and three (3) spent (empty) shells.' Complainant adds that respondent presented only an unsigned Memorandum Receipt (MR) of the firearm without any Mission Order or Permit to Carry. Oct 4, 2022 · I n Flores vs. Chua, the respondent lawyer was disbarred after he was found guilty of notarizing a forged deed of sale. The penalty of disbarment was imposed because in a previous administrative case, respondent was found guilty of violating Rule 1.01[16] of the Code of Professional Responsibility. Item 7 - 519 ... ... plaintiff has investigated the charges against the defendant and found them to be of substance. In many jurisdictions, a complaint does not need ...

LIWAYWAY B. SAMSON, complainant, vs. HON. ANTONIA CORPUZ-MACANDOG, respondent. A.M. No. R-621-RTJ September 26, 1986. VICTORIA TORRES, complainant, vs. ... the other charges brought against respondent are indeed serious. Taken collectively, they cast a heavy shadow on respondent's moral, intellectual and attitudinal …

The perjury case with P20,000,000.00 damages filed by respondent against herein complainant is an act done contrary to justice, honesty, modesty and good morals. The filing of perjury case with P20,000,000.00 damages against respondent is intended merely to harass, to injure, and oppress the complainant;

The Complainant and the Respondent will have an equal opportunity to participate in the investigation, including an equal opportunity to be heard, submit evidence, and suggest witnesses. The parties are strongly encouraged to preserve relevant evidence and share all information they have regarding the matter. The Investigator interviews ...ALEXANDER PADILLA, complainant, vs. THE HON. ... 1987, a clear indication of malice and ill-will of the complainant to subject respondent to harassment, humiliation and vindictiveness; that his decision, of which he submits a copy (Annex A) as part of his Answer, is based on "fundamental principles and the foundation of rights and justice" and ...Before the Court is the verified affidavit-complaint [1] of Pacita Caalim-Verzonilla seeking the disbarment of respondent Atty. Victoriano G. Pascua for allegedly falsifying a public document and evading the payment of correct taxes through the use of falsified documents. Complainant alleges that on September 15, 2001, respondent prepared and notarized two …ALEJANDRO ESTRADA, Complainant, vs. SOLEDAD S. ESCRITOR, Respondent. R E S O L U T I O N. PUNO, J.: While man is finite, he seeks and subscribes to the Infinite. Respondent Soledad Escritor once again stands before the Court invoking her religious freedom and her Jehovah God in a bid to save her family – united without the benefit of …Here are some tips: Research and understand the difference between civil and criminal cases. Use “claimant” only when referring to the party making a claim or bringing a case to court. Use “respondent” only when referring to the party responding to the claim or accusation made by the other party.A.C. No. 3056 August 16, 1991. ATTY. VICENTE C. RENOMERON respondent. This complaint for disbarment is related to the administrative case which complainant Attorney Fernando T. Collantes, house counsel for V & G Better Homes Subdivision, Inc. (V & G for short), filed against Attorney Vicente C. Renomeron, Register of Deeds of Tacloban City, for ... A.C. No. 5280 March 30, 2004. WILLIAM S. UY, complainant, vs. ATTY. FERMIN L. GONZALES, respondent. R E S O L U T I O N. AUSTRIA-MARTINEZ, J.: William S. Uy filed before this Court an administrative case against Atty. Fermin L. Gonzales for violation of the confidentiality of their lawyer-client relationship. The complainant alleges:In lang=en terms the difference between complainant and respondent. is that complainant is the party that brings a civil lawsuit against another; the plaintiff while respondent is person who answers for the defendant in a case before a court. In some legal systems, when one appeals a criminal case, one names the original court as defendant, but ...

The investigation is not a legal or disciplinary proceeding, and as a result, a Sexual Misconduct investigation does not determine guilt or innocence relative ...A.C. No. 5817 May 27, 2004. EMMA V. DE JUAN, complainant, vs. ATTY. OSCAR R. BARIA III, respondent. R E S O L U T I O N. QUISUMBING, J.: In her Salaysay filed with the Office of the Bar Confidant on August 29, 2002, complainant, former client of respondent, charged respondent with negligence in handling her labor case and threats against her ...Before the Court is a Complaint 1 disbarment dated November 11, 2014 filed by complainant Fe Eufemia Estalilla-Valmonte against respondent Atty. Jose C. Quesada, Jr. for violation of the Supreme Court's directive suspending him from the practice of law for a period of one (1) year pursuant to its December 2, 2013 Resolution in Dagala v. Atty. Quesada, Jr. 2 Before the Court is a Counter-Complaint1 filed by complainant (Ret.) Judge Virgilio Alpajora (Complainant) against respondent Atty. Ronaldo Antonio V. Calayan (Respondent), which originated from an administrative complaint filed by the latter against the former before the Office of the Court Administrator (OCA) for ignorance of the law and/or ... Instagram:https://instagram. what is an example of communitydhl express salaryhotels near ku campus lawrence ksanginol A.M. No. 1625. Republic of the Philippines SUPREME COURT Manila. EN BANC. A.M. No. 1625February 12, 1990. ANGEL L. BAUTISTA, complainant, vs. ATTY. RAMON A. GONZALES, respondent. R E S O L U T I O N. PER CURIAM: In a verified complaint filed by Angel L. Bautista on May 19, 1976, respondent Ramon A. Gonzales was charged with malpractice, deceit ... seldon kansaskansas 2023 roster The Court dismisses the administrative complaint against respondent for lack of jurisdiction. In the case of Alicias vs. Atty. Macatangay, et al., 12 the Court pronounced that jurisdiction over administrative cases against government lawyers relating to acts committed in the performance of their official functions, lies with the Ombudsman which exercises administrative supervision over them; thus: cooperative teaching and learning [ A. No. 12079, November 10, 2020 ] EDUARDO B. MANALANG, COMPLAINANT, VS. ATTY. CRISTINA BENOSA BUENDIA, RESPONDENT. FACTS: Before us is a disbarment complaint against Atty. Cristina Benosa Buendia (Atty. Buendia) for allegedly deceiving complainant Eduardo B. Manalang (Manalang) in connection with the latter's petition for nullity of his marriage.SUPREME COURT Manila. EN BANC. A.C. No. 7136 August 1, 2007. JOSELANO GUEVARRA, complainant, vs. ATTY. JOSE EMMANUEL EALA, respondent. D E C I S I O N. PER CURIAM: Joselano Guevarra (complainant) filed on March 4, 2002 a Complaint for Disbarment 1 before the Integrated Bar of the Philippines (IBP) Committee on Bar Discipline (CBD) against Atty. Jose …A.C. No. 6971 February 23, 2006. QUIRINO TOMLIN II, Complainant, vs. ATTY. SALVADOR N. MOYA II, Respondent. D E C I S I O N. YNARES-SANTIAGO, J.: On December 1, 2003, Quirino Tomlin II filed a complaint 1 before the Commission on Bar Discipline of the Integrated Bar of the Philippines (IBP) against Atty. Salvador N. Moya II for allegedly reneging on his monetary obligations and for having ...